<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteRebutting CBO&#039;s Climate Policy and Jobs Paper - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/05/06/rebutting-cbos-climate-job-killer-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/05/06/rebutting-cbos-climate-job-killer-paper/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Rebutting CBO&#8217;s Climate Policy and Jobs Paper</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/05/06/rebutting-cbos-climate-job-killer-paper/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The paper, carefully read, implies climate policy will create jobs. | The Congressional Budget Office issued a briefing paper yesterday concluding that climate pricing will slightly reduce employment overall in the United States, because green jobs gains won&#8217;t quite offset other job losses. Unfortunately, this paper will likely be misquoted and misunderstood repeatedly. It&#8217;s not what it seems. Properly understood, it should give us confidence that the clean-energy path is our best option by far for a high-employment future. Too bad...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
