<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteBC Carbon Tax Shift: Not as Good as it Used To Be? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/07/12/bc-carbon-tax-not-as-good-as-it-used-to-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/07/12/bc-carbon-tax-not-as-good-as-it-used-to-be/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>BC Carbon Tax Shift: Not as Good as it Used To Be?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/07/12/bc-carbon-tax-not-as-good-as-it-used-to-be/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[BC's landmark tax shift is falling more heavily on the poor. | We&#8217;ve beenratheroutspoken in our support of BC&#8217;s carbon tax shift. It stands out among global carbon pricing policies as particularly well-designed, for at least two reasons. First, it&#8217;s comprehensive and consistent. Most other policies around the world that put a price on carbon emissions also contain exemptions or loopholes that miss large parts of the economy, or apply different kinds of rules to different fossil fuel users. But BC&#8217;s carbon tax shift applies evenly to...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
