<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteComparing Tax Rates Under 1098 - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/08/12/comparing-tax-rates-under-1098/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/08/12/comparing-tax-rates-under-1098/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Tax Rates Under 1098</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/08/12/comparing-tax-rates-under-1098/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Would Washington's super wealthy be over taxed? | Here&#8217;s how state income taxes are applied in some of Washington&#8217;s peer states: It&#8217;s just a little context for evaluating certain claims that Initiative 1098 would send the super wealthy fleeing. Even for the tiny percentage of single earners pulling down $300,000 annually ($600,000 for couples), Washington&#8217;s income taxes would be very, very low compared to its neighbors.]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
