<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteBP &amp; Eyman&#039;s I-1053: Unconstitutional - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/08/16/bp-eymans-i-1053-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/08/16/bp-eymans-i-1053-unconstitutional/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>BP &amp; Eyman&#8217;s I-1053: Unconstitutional</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/08/16/bp-eymans-i-1053-unconstitutional/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Minority rule violates state charter. | Last time, I explained how Washington Initiative 1053, funded by BP and written by Tim Eyman, would impose minority rule over revenues and serve as a Trojan horse for the oil industry. It would allow Big Oil to continue shirking its responsibility for stemming the flow of oil into Puget Sound and other bodies of water. This time, a different point: I-1053 makes a mockery of the state constitution. Constitutions...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
