<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteA 50 State Comparison of Income Taxes - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/08/20/1098-50-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/08/20/1098-50-states/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>A 50 State Comparison of Income Taxes</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/08/20/1098-50-states/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[How does I-1098 stack up? | There&#8217;s really not a lot to add to these charts. What they show is that under I-1098, Washington&#8217;s income taxes would be extremely low by national standards. It&#8217;s true, however, that as incomes rise, 1098&#8217;s effective tax rate would climb somewhat, such that Washington would not be in the cellar of income tax payments. Yet even at very high levels of income, the tax burden would be substantially lighter than...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
