<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWhere Do Washington&#039;s Wealthy Live? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/09/09/where-do-washingtons-wealthy-live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/09/09/where-do-washingtons-wealthy-live/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Where Do Washington&#8217;s Wealthy Live?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/09/09/where-do-washingtons-wealthy-live/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The disparate impact of I-1098. | I&#8217;ve been wondering for a while about the balance of I-1098&#8217;s income tax provisions with respect to geography. So I crunched the numbers, and it turns out that it will likely have a vastly disproportionate impact on King County. Take a look: [Larger version here.] King County only holds about 28 percent of the state&#8217;s total households. Yet it is home to a whopping 57 percent of the state&#8217;s households bringing home more...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
