<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteSeattle Is Becoming More Kid-Friendly, Not Less - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/11/10/seattle-is-becoming-more-kid-friendly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/11/10/seattle-is-becoming-more-kid-friendly/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Seattle Is Becoming More Kid-Friendly, Not Less</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/11/10/seattle-is-becoming-more-kid-friendly/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Crosscut article misleads about family trends. | At Crosscut, Dick Morrill&#8217;s &#8220;How Seattle is exporting its poor people&#8221; set off my BS detector, so I decided to spot check one of the claims. Here&#8217;s what Morrill says about families: The traditional nuclear family&#8230; is remarkably low, by historic and US standards, in Seattle, Tacoma, and inner suburban areas. Conversely these core urban areas are high in non-family households, in singles and unmarried partners, both opposite and same...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
