<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteI-1053 Passes while Failing Its Own Test - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/11/15/i-1053-passes-while-failing-its-own-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/11/15/i-1053-passes-while-failing-its-own-test/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>I-1053 Passes while Failing Its Own Test</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/11/15/i-1053-passes-while-failing-its-own-test/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Harrumph! | Before I go off to lick my wounds (perhaps in beautiful San Juan County, the only county in the state of Washington that followed Sightline&#8217;s advice and voted &#8220;no&#8221; on I-1053), I want to point out one thing. Voters approved this undemocratic, unconstitutional, unfair, oil-industry Trojan Horse by 64 percent to 36 percent, but they didn&#8217;t vote for it by a wide enough margin to approve it under its own...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
