<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteMeasuring Congestion the Wrong Way - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2010/11/15/measuring-congestion-the-wrong-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2010/11/15/measuring-congestion-the-wrong-way/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Measuring Congestion the Wrong Way</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2010/11/15/measuring-congestion-the-wrong-way/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[New study finds that standard congestion measures are biased towards sprawl. | For decades, we&#8217;ve been hearing that congestion is getting worse and worse, and that traffic backups are taking a bigger and bigger bite out of our days (and paychecks) each year.&nbsp; But what if we&#8217;re measuring congestion wrong&#8212;and the conventional wisdom is largely hogwash? A geekalicious new report from CEOs for Cities shows that the nation&#8217;s most influential measure of congestion&#8212;the Urban Mobility Report by the Texas Transportation Institute, which...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
