<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteNo News is Bad News for Climate Attitudes - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/01/06/no-news-is-bad-news-for-climate-attitudes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/01/06/no-news-is-bad-news-for-climate-attitudes/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>No News is Bad News for Climate Attitudes</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/01/06/no-news-is-bad-news-for-climate-attitudes/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Fewer news stories may equate to less public concern about climate change. | A while back, we heard that Americans increasingly believed that news coverage about climate change was exaggerated. That seemed bad. Now we hear that news coverage is simply going away. That could be even worse! It&#8217;s a trend that bodes ill for already meager levels of public concern about global warming. Why? Because even if coverage doesn&#8217;t change peoples&#8217; minds about a certain topic, it does seem to impact issue...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
