<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteProductive Produce - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/02/10/productive-produce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/02/10/productive-produce/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Productive Produce</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/02/10/productive-produce/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Cabbage, watermelon, and greens end up on top. | Yesterday, Jen posted on getting the most bang for your buck in the produce section. By comparing the price-per-cup of various fruits and vegetables to their ANDI score, she arrived at a rough ranking of the best, cheapest sources to get your vitamins. (Note: neither of us is totally sold on the ANDI scoring method, but it at least provides some food for thought&#8212;pardon my pun.) She didn&#8217;t have time...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
