<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCoal Exports and Carbon Consequences - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/02/22/coal-exports-and-carbon-consequences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/02/22/coal-exports-and-carbon-consequences/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Coal Exports and Carbon Consequences</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/02/22/coal-exports-and-carbon-consequences/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[More pollution than 27 million people's gasoline. | There&#8217;s a heated controversy over plans for Washington state ports to ship large volumes of coal to China. In fact, last week we learned that the coal companies had been lying to the small community of Longview, Washington. In a proposal put forward to county commissioners and state officials, the company outlined plans for an export terminal that would handle around 5 million tons of coal annually. That&#8217;s a lot of coal. It raised eyebrows&#8212;and some...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
