<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCoal Export Jobs In Context - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/03/07/coal-export-jobs-in-context/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/03/07/coal-export-jobs-in-context/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Coal Export Jobs In Context</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/03/07/coal-export-jobs-in-context/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[What would coal shipments mean for local employment? | As the region considers the viability and wisdom of building new coal export facilities, there have been quite a few claims&#8212;not all of them entirely accurate&#8212;about jobs. So in the hopes of setting the record straight, here&#8217;s what the facts are. Longview (Millenium Bulk Logistics, Ambre)&#8212;Estimates for the original version of the project were that operations would employ 70 people to move about 5 million tons of coal. The site...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
