<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWSDOT vs. Reality - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/07/13/wsdot-vs-reality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/07/13/wsdot-vs-reality/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>WSDOT vs. Reality</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/07/13/wsdot-vs-reality/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 08:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Puget Sound traffic forecasts don't even pass the laugh test. | I wish I were making this up. The Washington State Department of Transportation continues to insist that traffic volumes on the SR-520 bridge across lake Washington are going up up up&#8212;even though actual traffic volumes have been flat or declining for more than a decade! In a charitable mood, you could forgive the 1996 projections. Back then, rapid traffic growth on SR-520 was a recent memory: up through about 1988,...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
