<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWalkScore&#039;s New Rankings for Cities - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/07/20/walkscores-new-rankings-for-cities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/07/20/walkscores-new-rankings-for-cities/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>WalkScore&#039;s New Rankings for Cities</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/07/20/walkscores-new-rankings-for-cities/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[2,500 cities ranked using 2010 Census data. | My heroes at WalkScore are out today with updated walkability rankings for American cities. Using the new 2010 Census data and enlarging their analysis to include 2,500 cities, WalkScore&#8217;s new analysis includes some changes from last time around in 2008. Here are the top 10 big cities for walking. There are some changes from last time around: New York nudged San Francisco out of the top spot; Seattle stuck to...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
