<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteDebunking Two Bad Coal Arguments - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/07/27/debunking-two-bad-coal-arguments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/07/27/debunking-two-bad-coal-arguments/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Debunking Two Bad Coal Arguments</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/07/27/debunking-two-bad-coal-arguments/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Washington's coal lobby getting desperate?  | Perhaps it&#8217;s a sign of increasing desperation, but Washington&#8217;s coal lobby is trotting out some real whoppers lately. Let&#8217;s take a look at what the Bellingham coal port people said in a recent email under the Orwellian banner, &#8220;The Truth About Coal Consumption.&#8221; You get a flavor for the folks behind the Gateway Pacific Terminal (GPT) right off the bat when they claim, in the very first sentence of their...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
