<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCoal Exports From Canada - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/08/04/coal-exports-from-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/08/04/coal-exports-from-canada/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Coal Exports From Canada</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/08/04/coal-exports-from-canada/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Why coal planned for Washington's ports can't divert to BC. | Sightline is publishing a new research memo today that documents the facts about Canada&#8217;s coal exporting capacity. The memo finds that ports in British Columbia do not have sufficient capacity to handle the volumes of coal planned for Washington ports. The state coal lobby claims that US coal exports will simply shift to BC if Washington doesn&#8217;t build its own export facilities. Yet the numbers tell a different story. The...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
