<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteAt Least The Website Is Clean - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/08/10/at-least-the-website-is-clean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/08/10/at-least-the-website-is-clean/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>At Least The Website Is Clean</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/08/10/at-least-the-website-is-clean/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[What the railroads don't want you to know about coal dust.  | Coal dust is a problem for railways. It escapes from rail cars during shipping, creating safety and congestion problems. It&#8217;s toxic, unhealthy, and obviously unpopular with nearby communities. And yet&#8230; coal is the single biggest source of revenue for freight railways. So when debate about new export terminals turns to coal dust, what&#8217;s a railroad to do? According to BNSF&#8212;shipper of Powder River Basin coal to the Northwest&#8212;the answer is:...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
