<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThe Risky Business of Coal Exports - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/09/08/the-risky-business-of-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/09/08/the-risky-business-of-coal/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Risky Business of Coal Exports</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/09/08/the-risky-business-of-coal/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Northwest ports are saying no to coal exports.  | With all the hullabaloo surrounding a handful of ports considering coal exports, it&#8217;s easy to forget that many communities are flatly rejecting it. In fact, coal is so unattractive that a number of Northwest ports have already said no, despite aggressively pursuing new business. Recently, the Port of Tacoma, located on Puget Sound, and the Columbia River Ports of Vancouver, Kalama, and Portland have all considered&#8212;and rejected&#8212;coal export proposals. Port of...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
