<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteGambling on Coal, and Losing - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/09/12/gambling-on-coal-and-losing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/09/12/gambling-on-coal-and-losing/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Gambling on Coal, and Losing</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/09/12/gambling-on-coal-and-losing/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 16:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The history of West Coast coal terminals. | West Coast port cities have already gambled and lost on coal export facilities. After investing millions of dollars in infrastructure and setting aside sizeable harbor acreage to coal export facilities, both Portland and Los Angeles watched their promised revenue from coal exports evaporate. Worse yet, local communities were stuck with the tab. The abandoned coal export facilities locked up millions of dollars in stranded investments and clean-up expenses, not to...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
