<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteAn Alternative to Coal Jobs - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/09/14/an-alternative-to-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/09/14/an-alternative-to-coal/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>An Alternative to Coal Jobs</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/09/14/an-alternative-to-coal/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 16:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Clean redevelopment provides more employment at Northwest ports. | If coal export terminals are too risky for many ports because of their checkered past on the West Coast, there is a alternative strategy for economic development: clean up and redevelopment of polluted port sites. It&#8217;s a strategy that is proving to create many more jobs than coal, and with far less pollution. First, though, to understand how poorly coal export stacks up, let&#8217;s consider the facts at Longview. Millennium...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
