<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThe Instability of Coal Exports - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/10/12/the-instability-of-coal-exports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/10/12/the-instability-of-coal-exports/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Instability of Coal Exports</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/10/12/the-instability-of-coal-exports/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Regional export data reveal coal's volatile history.  | When the Port of Vancouver, Washington rejected a recent coal export proposal the Port&#8217;s operations manager, Mike Schiller, explained that the economic fundamentals of coal are bad. &#8220;Coal is the most risky bulk mineral market,&#8221; is how Schiller put it. To find out what he meant, I did a little digging into the US Department of Energy&#8217;s quarterly coal export figures, which are kept online for each customs district in the country...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
