<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCoal Company Destroys Key Argument for Coal Terminal - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/11/09/coal-company-destroys-key-argument-for-coal-terminal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/11/09/coal-company-destroys-key-argument-for-coal-terminal/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Coal Company Destroys Key Argument for Coal Terminal</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/11/09/coal-company-destroys-key-argument-for-coal-terminal/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 00:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Industry shows that BC can't take Washington coal exports.  | Cloud Peak Energy says they will ship 4 million tons of coal from British Columbia&#8217;s Westshore Terminal this year. That means Cloud Peak is almost solely responsible for current US coal exports to Asia via BC. (See here and here for US Customs figures.) Yet in a new investor report, Cloud Peak says they can&#8217;t increase coal shipments to Asia because there&#8217;s no room at BC export terminals. This is...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
