<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCoal Exports Are Bigger Threat Than Tar Sands Pipeline - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/11/16/coal-exports-are-bigger-threat-than-tar-sands-pipeline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/11/16/coal-exports-are-bigger-threat-than-tar-sands-pipeline/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Coal Exports Are Bigger Threat Than Tar Sands Pipeline</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/11/16/coal-exports-are-bigger-threat-than-tar-sands-pipeline/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[A carbon comparison of Northwest coal plans and Keystone XL project. | The planned Keystone XL oil pipeline has earned major national attention for the damage it would do to the climate. At the same time, another climate drama is playing out with much less attention as coal companies make plans to export huge quantities to Asia by way of Pacific Northwest ports. It&#8217;s pretty clear that both projects are environmental horror stories, but I&#8217;ve been wondering: which one is worse? So,...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
