<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThe Art of Talking Climate Science - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2011/11/21/the-art-of-talking-climate-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2011/11/21/the-art-of-talking-climate-science/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>The Art of Talking Climate Science</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2011/11/21/the-art-of-talking-climate-science/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Four essential messaging guidelines for climate scientists talking to non-scientists. | Let&#8217;s face it; few of us speak in perfect, clear, stirring, and memorable soundbites. But scientists are particularly apt to load their communications with so many caveats and so much detail that non-scientists have a hard time determining whether they&#8217;ve said anything definitive at all! Scientists have good reason to be particularly cautious in their communications&#8212;and in a politically charged environment, climate scientists are particularly gun shy. So what&#8217;s a...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
