<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWill Puget Sound Energy Double Down on Coal? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/03/26/to-junk-or-not-to-junk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/03/26/to-junk-or-not-to-junk/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Will Puget Sound Energy Double Down on Coal?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/03/26/to-junk-or-not-to-junk/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[What coal plants and ancient Subarus have in common. | Attention Puget Sound Energy customers: Don&#8217;t feel bad if you missed the connection between your electricity bills and today&#8217;s headlines about reducing air pollution in scenic Montana. It&#8217;s not obvious. But news that the federal government wants owners of the Colstrip coal plant to invest in expensive new equipment to reduce a fraction of its dirty emissions does affect more than 1 million electricity users in Washington State. That&#8217;s because...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
