<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCoal Exports and Carbon Consequences II - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/05/23/coal-exports-and-carbon-consequences-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/05/23/coal-exports-and-carbon-consequences-ii/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Coal Exports and Carbon Consequences II</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/05/23/coal-exports-and-carbon-consequences-ii/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[How much is 145 million tons of coal? | There are at present six proposals to export coal from Northwest ports. If all of these proposals are built, and if all of them operate at full capacity, the Northwest would be shipping 145 million tons of coal per year. When burned, that coal will produce roughly 262 million tons of carbon dioxide per year. It&#8217;s such a staggering figure, that it&#8217;s a little hard to grasp. So here&#8217;s some...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
