<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteIs It Fair to Make Phone Books Optional? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/13/is-it-fair-to-make-phone-books-optional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/13/is-it-fair-to-make-phone-books-optional/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Is It Fair to Make Phone Books Optional?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/13/is-it-fair-to-make-phone-books-optional/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 21:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[How other states preserve equity while reducing waste. | Ending Washington&#8217;s regime of mandatory white pages delivery is common sense. Sightline, Seattle Public Utilities, Dex, CenturyLink, and many other telecom entities in the state support the idea. The state attorney general opposes it for two apparent reasons. The AG argues, first, that optional delivery of white pages would be a threat to public safety&#8212;a silly argument we have addressed previously&#8212;and, second, that optional white pages would prevent equal access...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
