<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteClimate&#039;s Weathercaster Problem - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/27/why-weathercasters-lag-on-climate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/27/why-weathercasters-lag-on-climate/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Climate&#8217;s Weathercaster Problem</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/27/why-weathercasters-lag-on-climate/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Weathercasters are trusted interpreters but lag behind on climate science. | Polling from 2011 shows that a majority of us now link an unnaturally warming climate to droughts, floods, and other extremes. But, according to opinion research by George Mason University, only 19 percent of television weather forecasters acknowledge the established science of climate change. An earlier study found that 27 percent of TV meteorologists call global warming a &#8220;scam,&#8221; while over half deny that humans are the cause. It&#8217;s a...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
