<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteTraffic Forecasting: A Blast from the Present - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/28/traffic-forecasting-a-blast-from-the-present/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/28/traffic-forecasting-a-blast-from-the-present/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Traffic Forecasting: A Blast from the Present</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/28/traffic-forecasting-a-blast-from-the-present/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Reliably-wrong traffic models are so passe...right? | Oops, they did it again. As we mentioned earlier in the week, way back in 1991 the Washington State Department of Transportation recommended that engineers forecast future traffic volumes by finding a recent period of steady traffic growth, and simply assuming that this growth would continue. Although that approach probably worked well enough back in 1991, it’s been failing the region badly for the last decade. Surely by now traffic engineers...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
