<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWeekend Reading 6/29/12 - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/29/weekend-reading-62912/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/29/weekend-reading-62912/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Weekend Reading 6/29/12</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/06/29/weekend-reading-62912/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Food pictures make us fat, soccer ball electricity, and more. | Clark: Apparently, many European traffic demand models are no better than the ones used in North America. This paper reviews a traffic model used in Copenhagen, and found that it was simply incapable of including long-term “induced traffic” (the “if you build it, they will come” phenomenon) in its forecasts. But when the model was tweaked to look at modest, short-term induced traffic, it predicted lower travel time savings, worse environmental...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
