<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWhy is the US Government So Bullish On Coal? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/07/19/why-is-the-us-government-so-bullish-on-coal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/07/19/why-is-the-us-government-so-bullish-on-coal/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Why is the US Government So Bullish On Coal?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/07/19/why-is-the-us-government-so-bullish-on-coal/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Energy Department forecasts at odds with industry.  | US energy policies prop up coal consumption in a variety of ways, some clear and some less so. For example, the Bureau of Land Management has lately come in for a drubbing for leasing public lands to coal mining companies at comically low rates, and to the detriment of taxpayers. Official bullishness on coal extends to other government agencies too, such as the Department of Energy, which produces the nation&#8217;s energy...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
