<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteSR-520: A Case of Bad Forecasting? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/09/10/sr-520-a-victim-of-bad-forecasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/09/10/sr-520-a-victim-of-bad-forecasting/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>SR-520: A Case of Bad Forecasting?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/09/10/sr-520-a-victim-of-bad-forecasting/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Early predictions overstated growth, underestimated diversion. | Here’s a blast from the past: WSDOT’S early forecasts, dating from 2002, for SR-520 traffic after tolling was scheduled to start. Depending on the tolling scenario, they predicted that the floating bridge would carry between 90,000 and 98,000 cars per day in the first year of tolling, down from a baseline of 118,000 cars per day with no tolling. (The report isn’t available online, so click for the full-sized scanned...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
