<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteAlaskan Way Viaduct: More Revenue Shortfalls Expected - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/09/18/alaskan-way-viaduct-more-revenue-shortfalls-expected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/09/18/alaskan-way-viaduct-more-revenue-shortfalls-expected/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Alaskan Way Viaduct: More Revenue Shortfalls Expected</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/09/18/alaskan-way-viaduct-more-revenue-shortfalls-expected/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't count on $200 million from tolls---unless you want massive traffic diversion. | This should come as a surprise to precisely nobody&#8212;and yet there&#8217;s still something shocking about this article from Mike Lindblom at The Seattle Times: More than three years after state lawmakers approved the Highway 99 tunnel, officials have yet to figure out how they can collect tolls for construction without clogging Seattle streets&#8230;One scenario, with tolls from $1 off-peak to $3.25 peak each direction, would raise $200 million for construction...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
