<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteColumbia River Crossing: Cutting Ped/Bike Projects - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/09/24/columbia-river-crossing-cutting-pedbike-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/09/24/columbia-river-crossing-cutting-pedbike-projects/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Columbia River Crossing: Cutting Ped/Bike Projects</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/09/24/columbia-river-crossing-cutting-pedbike-projects/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this the cost-containment strategy for all highway megaprojects? | And so it begins. Faced with mounting costs and uncertain funding, the planners of the Columbia River Crossing are hoping to &#8220;save&#8221; money by postponing parts of the project. And unsurprisingly, biking and walking investments are among the first things on the chopping block. If you want the details, BikePortland has the goods. Of course, it&#8217;s just a proposal at this point. But it&#8217;s a telling one. First, because of the...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
