<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteRecent Coal Export Trends: Q2 2012 - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/10/05/recent-coal-export-trends-q2-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/10/05/recent-coal-export-trends-q2-2012/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Recent Coal Export Trends: Q2 2012</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/10/05/recent-coal-export-trends-q2-2012/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Exports rise in the Northwest and nationally. | Here’s data from the latest coal report from the US Energy Information Administration, taking us up through the second quarter of 2012: [Update 12/28/12: The green line labelled is in error on this chart. The San Diego Customs District exported virtually no coal products in Q2 2012.] In the Western Customs Region, depicted above, three Districts reported meaningful quantities of coal exports. Here&#8217;s the interesting stuff. The Seattle District figures represent...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
