<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteProof That Car-Sharing is Cheaper Than Free - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/10/25/proof-that-car-sharing-is-cheaper-than-free/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/10/25/proof-that-car-sharing-is-cheaper-than-free/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Proof That Car-Sharing is Cheaper Than Free</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/10/25/proof-that-car-sharing-is-cheaper-than-free/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[New Oregon analysis points to cost-effective climate solutions.  | When you say &#8220;greenhouse gas marginal abatement cost curve&#8221; I say &#8220;where do I sign up?&#8221; I guess that&#8217;s why I was interested in Oregon&#8217;s look at the cost-effectiveness of various carbon reduction strategies. Despite the fact that the new analysis weighs in at over 400 pages and is tangled up with altogether too much econowonk-speak, there are a few pretty interesting findings. Chief among them: car sharing ranks as the...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
