<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWould Coal Ships Threaten the San Juan Islands? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2012/10/26/would-coal-ships-threaten-the-san-juan-islands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2012/10/26/would-coal-ships-threaten-the-san-juan-islands/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Would Coal Ships Threaten the San Juan Islands?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2012/10/26/would-coal-ships-threaten-the-san-juan-islands/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[What fossil fuel export plans mean for Northwest waters. | A lot of the debate about coal export proposals has centered on the impacts of coal trains, and yet&#8212;as students of geography like to point out&#8212;you can&#8217;t actually get coal from the Northwest to Asia on trains. You need ships too. A lot of ships. The proposed coal terminal at Cherry Point, for example, would require 974 trips annually through the San Juan Islands by huge coal-bearing cargo ships. And...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
