<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteNorthwest Coal Exports: What to Expect in 2016 - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2016/03/02/northwest-coal-exports-what-to-expect-in-2016/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2016/03/02/northwest-coal-exports-what-to-expect-in-2016/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Northwest Coal Exports: What to Expect in 2016</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2016/03/02/northwest-coal-exports-what-to-expect-in-2016/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[What you need to know about the current state of Northwest coal export schemes. | In 2016, the debate over Northwest coal exports will heat up again. Of the six projects originally targeted for Oregon and Washington, all but two have died. And these two&#8212;terminals that would be the first and second largest in North America&#8212;will come up for public review this year when the government agencies reviewing them will publish Draft Environmental Impact Statements. These documents are the first opportunity for the public to...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
