<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCoal Export Facilities Make Bad Neighbors - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2016/04/29/coal-export-facilities-make-bad-neighbors-coal-dust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2016/04/29/coal-export-facilities-make-bad-neighbors-coal-dust/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Coal Export Facilities Make Bad Neighbors</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2016/04/29/coal-export-facilities-make-bad-neighbors-coal-dust/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 22:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Documenting the spread of coal dust at export terminals. | Several West Coast communities are considering whether to roll out the welcome mat for new coal export terminals. In evaluating the merits of these proposals in places like Oakland, California, and Longview, Washington, it’s useful to examine the industry’s real-world track record. As one study of coal port operations put it, “coal terminals by their nature are active sources of fugitive dust.” Seward, Alaska In Seward, Alaska, residents sued the...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
