<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteThree Ways Oregon and Washington Could Vote Better - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2016/05/02/three-ways-oregon-and-washington-could-vote-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2016/05/02/three-ways-oregon-and-washington-could-vote-better/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Three Ways Oregon and Washington Could Vote <i>Better</i></title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2016/05/02/three-ways-oregon-and-washington-could-vote-better/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 13:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Cascadian states could lead the United States towards proportional representation voting. | Last time, I explained how the rise of independent voters and the popularity of party outsiders Sanders and Trump show that American voters want more options, and how the path to change in the United States is through the individual states themselves. Here, I describe a few ways Oregon and Washington could do what New Zealand did: switch from winner-take-all voting to proportional representation voting. By making the switch, Oregon...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
