<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteExamining Methanol&#039;s Green Claims in the Northwest - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2016/06/23/examining-methanols-green-claims-in-the-northwest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2016/06/23/examining-methanols-green-claims-in-the-northwest/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Examining Methanol&#8217;s Green Claims in the Northwest</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2016/06/23/examining-methanols-green-claims-in-the-northwest/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Available evidence&mdash;and lack of it&mdash;make for a dubious case. | The backers of several proposed petrochemical refineries in the Northwest are pitching their projects as environmentally responsible investments that would reduce global warming pollution. Billed as a cleaner means of creating methanol, the proponents allege that they will enable Chinese manufacturers to produce olefins, a precursor to plastics manufacturing, with much less pollution than current methods. Yet there is vanishingly little evidence to support these claims&#8212;and what evidence exists actually...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
