<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteFollowing the Money in Washington State Elections, Part 3 - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2016/10/31/following-the-money-in-washington-state-elections-part-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2016/10/31/following-the-money-in-washington-state-elections-part-3/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Following the Money in Washington State Elections, Part 3</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2016/10/31/following-the-money-in-washington-state-elections-part-3/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Visualizing in-district giving in same-sized districts.  | In the previous article in this series about Washington’s Citizens’ Initiative 1464, we mapped in-district giving to winning Washington state legislative candidates. But mapping Washington’s legislative districts geographically creates a misleading visual distortion of the data. Despite the fact that each legislative district contains nearly the same number of people, sparsely populated rural districts are geographically much larger than densely populated urban districts. As a result, rural districts loom large,...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
