<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWould the Dakota Access Pipeline Help Canadian Oil Producers? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/01/27/would-the-dakota-access-pipeline-help-canadian-oil-producers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/01/27/would-the-dakota-access-pipeline-help-canadian-oil-producers/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Would the Dakota Access Pipeline Help Canadian Oil Producers?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/01/27/would-the-dakota-access-pipeline-help-canadian-oil-producers/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[The big winner from Trump's energy policy could be Canada's dirty oil industry. | As you may have heard, the Trump administration recently signed orders designed to pave the way for two controversial oil pipelines, Dakota Access (DAPL) and Keystone XL. Surprisingly, though, the main beneficiaries of this move may be Canadian, not American. This seems clear enough the case for the Keystone XL pipeline, which was explicitly designed to move cheap, sludgy crude from the tar sands plants in Alberta, Canada, into the US market....]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
