<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWhy To Say &ldquo;Protections,&rdquo; Not &ldquo;Regulations&rdquo; - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/02/21/why-you-should-say-protections-not-regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/02/21/why-you-should-say-protections-not-regulations/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Why To Say &ldquo;Protections,&rdquo; Not &ldquo;Regulations&rdquo;</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/02/21/why-you-should-say-protections-not-regulations/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 14:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Good advice from linguist and political strategy guru George Lakoff. | Quite a while back I wrote about how the Environmental Protection Agency should be renamed the Environmental Protection Army, with the idea that the name might prompt people to take its role in protecting American people more seriously&#8212;on a par with the way they see (and fund, staff, and empower) the military. Call it what we will, it&#8217;s time now again to revisit the reasons majorities of Americans of all...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
