<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteSightline’s Voting System Reform Priorities in Oregon and Washington - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/04/03/sightlines-voting-system-reform-priorities-in-oregon-and-washington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/04/03/sightlines-voting-system-reform-priorities-in-oregon-and-washington/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Sightline’s Voting System Reform Priorities in Oregon and Washington</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/04/03/sightlines-voting-system-reform-priorities-in-oregon-and-washington/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2017 13:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[A wish list of policies to achieve more representative and effective governance. | We’re trying something a little different. The two memos linked below are not thoroughly vetted and reviewed reports or articles like most of our publications. Instead, we are sharing Sightline’s internal strategy for voting systems reform. These are based on research, of course, but they mostly reflect Sightline’s current judgment, which we may revise with further learning. We tried to make each memo internally self-explanatory, but reforms mentioned are or...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
