<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteCoal Exports: After the Crash, Now What? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/04/06/coal-exports-after-the-crash-now-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/04/06/coal-exports-after-the-crash-now-what/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Coal Exports: After the Crash, Now What?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/04/06/coal-exports-after-the-crash-now-what/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 20:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Souring Asian markets have killed export projects and put export-oriented mines in jeopardy. | Another month, another coal export project down the tubes. This time it&#8217;s the proposed Chuitna mine in Alaska, a controversial export project launched a few years ago near the peak in the Pacific Rim coal bubble. After submitting several thousand pages of permitting documentation, the project backers had no choice but to shelve the project after the main investor pulled out&#8212;no doubt disheartened that Asia&#8217;s formerly red-hot coal market has cooled...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
