<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteNorthwest Coal Terminals’ Last Stand - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/04/17/northwest-coal-terminals-last-stand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/04/17/northwest-coal-terminals-last-stand/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Northwest Coal Terminals’ Last Stand</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/04/17/northwest-coal-terminals-last-stand/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[Many tons of coal dust would escape from the proposed Millennium Bulk Terminal on the Columbia River&mdash;far more than estimated in the draft environmental impact statement for the project. | Even before amendments come in about its environmental impacts, the last of six coal terminals proposed for the Pacific Northwest is on the ropes, having been denied a crucial sublease by the Washington Department of Natural Resources. And the coal dust it would release into the surroundings may be the final nail in its coffin. First proposed in 2012 at a projected cost of $680 million, the Millennium Bulk Terminal...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
