<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteOf Cascadia’s Big Cities, Who’s Tops in Bikeways? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/05/01/of-cascadias-big-cities-whos-tops-in-bikeways/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/05/01/of-cascadias-big-cities-whos-tops-in-bikeways/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Of Cascadia’s Big Cities, Who’s Tops in Bikeways?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/05/01/of-cascadias-big-cities-whos-tops-in-bikeways/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 13:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s a tight race between Portland, Seattle, and Vancouver. | It only takes a few minutes talking to transport honchos in Portland, Seattle, and Vancouver, BC, to get a sense of the intense, if friendly, competition among their cities to be king of the cycling hill. But in many ways the three largest urban centers of Cascadia form one big, soggy petri dish of experimentation in bike infrastructure. All three are North American leaders in prioritizing complete streets and bicycle...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
