<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sightline InstituteWere Fossil Fuel Exports the Big Loser in BC&#039;s Election? - Sightline Institute</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.sightline.org/2017/05/10/were-fossil-fuel-exports-the-big-loser-in-bcs-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.sightline.org/2017/05/10/were-fossil-fuel-exports-the-big-loser-in-bcs-election/</link>
	<description>News and Views for a Sustainable Northwest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 15:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.3</generator>
	
		<item>
		<title>Were Fossil Fuel Exports the Big Loser in BC&#8217;s Election?</title>
		<link><![CDATA[https://www.sightline.org/2017/05/10/were-fossil-fuel-exports-the-big-loser-in-bcs-election/]]></link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2017 23:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter the outcome, some fossil fuel exporters will face bitter disappointments. | BC residents took to the polls Tuesday to elect a new Parliament&#8212;and for fossil fuel exports a lot rode on the electoral outcome. A win by the right-of-center BC Liberal Party could have spelled doom for BC coal exports, particularly from US companies shipping their wares through southern BC. Liberal leader Christy Clark had taken an unexpectedly strong stand against coal shipments to overseas power plants: she first sent a...]]></description>
					</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
